• I’ve been looking forward to this particular dissection ever since I read chapter 4 in Fawn M. Brodie’s “No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith.” In it, she points out the uncanny resemblance between Lehi’s vision in 1 Nephi 8 and a dream Joseph Smith Sr. had earlier in life. As you will see, this is more solid evidence of Joseph’s plagiarism when composing the Book of Mormon. Brodie points out this vivid dream was recorded in Lucy Smith’s “Biographical Sketches” on pages 58 and 59. My endless curiosity piqued; I made the decision to proceed with no caution down a rabbit hole to find this excerpt myself. Much to my delight, the website https://archive.org exists and happens to have this book in its entirety available for the perpetually inquisitive. I proceeded forth like a treasure hunter, peering at a map and making my way towards this fascinating paragraph. Sure enough, as cited, pages 58 and 59 held the key to what clearly fueled Lehi’s vision. Since I’m the sort of person who loves receipts, I will be including those screenshots for your examination. Now, onto today’s reading.

    1 Nephi, Chapter 8

    Lehi sees a vision of the tree of life. He partakes of its fruit and desires his family to do likewise. He sees a rod of iron, a straight and narrow path, and the mists of darkness that enshroud men. Sariah, Nephi, and Sam partake of the fruit, but Laman and Lemuel refuse. About 600-592 B.C.

    1: “And it came to pass that we had gathered together all manner of seeds of every kind, both of grain of every kind, and also of the seeds of the fruit of every kind.”

    2: “And it came to pass that while my father tarried in the wilderness he spake unto us, saying: Behold, I have dreamed a dream; or, in other words, I have seen a vision.”

    3: “And behold, because of the thing which I have seen, I have reason to rejoice in the Lord because of Nephi and also of Sam; for I have reason to suppose that they, and also many of their seed, will be saved.”

    4: “But behold, Laman and Lemuel, I fear exceedingly because of you; for behold, methought I saw in my dream, a dark and dreary wilderness.”

    Lucy’s recollection of Joseph Sr.’s dream reads, “I thought I was thus traveling in an open and desolate field, which appeared very barren…” This may not seem like much at first but keep reading. It gets stranger.

    5: “And it came to pass that I saw a man, and he was dressed in a white robe; and he came and stood before me.”

    6: “And it came to pass that he spake unto me, and bade me follow him.”

    7: “And it came to pass that as I followed him I beheld myself that I was in a dark and dreary waste.”

    While the guide in Joseph Sr.’s dream is not described, we know he had one: “My guide, who was by my side, as before, said, “This is a desolate world; but travel on.”

    8: “And after I had traveled for the space of many hours in darkness, I began to pray unto the Lord that he would have mercy on me, according to the multitude of his tender mercies.”

    9: “And it came to pass after I had prayed unto the Lord I beheld a large and spacious field.”

    10: “And it came to pass that I beheld a tree, whose fruit was desirable to make one happy.”

    11: “And it came to pass that I did go forth and partake of the fruit thereof; and I beheld that it was most sweet, above all that I ever before tasted. Yea, and I beheld that the fruit thereof was white, to exceed all whiteness that I had ever seen.”

    “… and beyond me was a low, but very pleasant, valley in which stood a tree, such as I had never seen before. It was exceedingly handsome, insomuch that I looked upon it with wonder and admiration…. and it bore a kind of fruit, in shape much like a chestnut bur, and as white as snow, or, if possible, whiter… I drew near, and began to eat of it, and I found it delicious beyond description.”

    12: “And as I partook of the fruit thereof it filled my soul with exceedingly great joy; wherefor, I began to be desirous that my family should partake of it also; for I knew that it was desirable above all other fruit.”

    “As I was eating, I said in my heart, ‘I cannot eat this alone. I must bring my wife and children, that they may partake with me.’”

    13: “And as I cast my eyes round about, that perhaps I might discover my family also, I beheld a river of water; and it ran along, and it was near the tree of which I was partaking the fruit.”

    “… I beheld a beautiful stream of water, which ran from the east and to the west.”

    14: “And I looked to behold from whence it came; and I saw at the head thereof a little way off; and at the head thereof I beheld your mother Sariah, and Sam, and Nephi; and they stood as if they knew not whither they should go.”

    15: “And it came to pass that I beckoned unto them; and I also did say unto them with a loud voice that they should come unto me, and partake of the fruit, which was desirable above all other fruit.”

    16: “And it came to pass that they did come unto me and partake of the fruit also.”

    “Accordingly, I went and brought my family, which consisted of a wife and seven children, and we all commenced eating, and praising God for this blessing.”

    17: “And it came to pass that I was desirous that Laman and Lemuel should come and partake of the fruit also; wherefore, I cast mine eyes towards the head of the river, that perhaps I might see them.”

    18: “And it came to pass that I saw them, but they would not come unto me and partake of the fruit.”

    19: “And I beheld a rod of iron, and it extended along the bank of the river, and led to the tree by which I stood.”

    20: “And I also beheld a straight and narrow path, which came along by the rod of iron, even to the tree by which I stood; and it also led by the head of the fountain, unto a large and spacious field, as if it had been a world.”

    “Traveling a short distance further, I came to a narrow path. This path I entered, and, when I had traveled a little way in it, I beheld a beautiful stream of water, which ran from the east to the west. Of this stream I could see neither the source nor yet the termination; but as far as my eyes could extend I could see a rope, running along the bank of it…”

    The next several verses describe a multitude of people trying to find their way down the path and grasping the rod of iron. Those who made it to the tree also ate the fruit. Then there’s this:

    26: “And I also cast my eyes round about, and beheld, on the other side of the river of water, a great and spacious building; and it stood as it were in the air, high above the earth.”

    27: “And it was filled with people, both old and young, both male and female; and their manner of dress was exceedingly fine; and they were in the attitude of mocking and pointing their fingers towards those who had come at and were partaking of the fruit.”

    “While thus engaged, I beheld a spacious building standing opposite the valley which we were in, and it appeared to reach to the very heavens. It was full of doors and windows, and they were filled with people, who were very finely dressed. When these people observed us in the low valley, under the tree, they pointed the finger of scorn at us, and treated us with all manner of disrespect and contempt.”

    In the next few verses, more people eat the fruit, and they also get scorned. They then feel shame from the scorn and follow other paths.

    33: “And great was the multitude that did enter into that strange building. And after they did enter into that building they did point the finger of scorn at me and those that were partaking of the fruit also; but we heeded them not.”

    “But their contumely we utterly disregarded.”

    While Lucy Smith’s “Biographical Sketches” was not published until after Joseph’s Smith’s death, I think it is safe and perfectly reasonable to assume that if she appreciated her husband’s dream enough to record it in such detail and publish it, she would have told it and retold it to her children and others. This vision of Lehi’s is suspiciously similar to it, and I am left to conclude that Joseph simply copied it and changed a few details around because he probably never thought his mother would publish a biography with the dream in it. He could not have been a true prophet of God, and this is one of many reasons why. I will be expounding upon those reasons as I get further into the Book of Mormon and examine the Doctrine and Covenants. As promised, behold my screenshots!

  • The title is a phrase I keep muttering to myself while reading the Book of Mormon. Read on to see why.

    1 Nephi Chapter 7

    Lehi’s sons return to Jerusalem and invite Ishmael and his household to join them in their journey. Laman and others rebel. Nephi exhorts his brethren to have faith in the Lord. They bind him with cords and plan his destruction. He is freed by the power of faith. His brethren ask forgiveness. Lehi and his company offer sacrifice and burnt offerings. About 600-592 B.C. 

    1: “And now I would that ye might know, that after my father, Lehi, had made an end of prophesying concerning his seed, it came to pass that the Lord spake unto him again, saying that was not meet for him, Lehi, that he should take his family into the wilderness alone; but that his sons should take daughters to wife, that they might raise up seed unto the Lord in the land of promise.”

    2: “And it came to pass that the Lord commanded him that I, Nephi, and my brethren, should again return unto the land of Jerusalem, and bring down Ishmael and his family into the wilderness.”

    Who is Ishmael? If you read the Old Testament, you’ll notice when someone is named, “son of…” is somehow attached to who is being named. This does not always occur when the person being spoken about is well-known already to the narrative. For example, King David is not always written as “David, son of Jesse,” but his father was named at the start of and throughout the record of his life in the Old Testament. So, it’s strange and differs from the Bible to simply bring some seemingly random person into the story without clarifying who they are in relation to their tribe and others. 

    4: “And it came to pass that we went up into the house of Ishmael, and we did gain favor in the sight of Ishmael, insomuch that we did speak unto him the words of the Lord.”

    What were those words? What was said to him and his household to convince them to leave their home and go into the wilderness? It’s strange that nothing that was said at this meeting made it into this record. 

    5: “And it came to pass that the Lord did soften the heart of Ishmael, and also his household, insomuch that they took their journey with us down into the wilderness to the tent of our father.”

    This verse makes the aforementioned missing information more bizarre. In what way did Ishmael’s heart need softening? Against what was it hardened? Against God, or against leaving? 

    6: “And it came to pass that as we journeyed in the wilderness, behold Laman and Lemuel, and two of the daughters of Ishmael, and two of the sons of Ishmael and their families, did rebel against us; yea, against me, Nephi, and Sam, and their father, Ishmael, and his wife, and his three other daughters.”

    7: “And it came to pass in the which rebellion, they were desirous to return unto the land of Jerusalem.”

    I’ll mention again that I am typing these verses out exactly as they’re printed in the Book of Mormon. So, grammatically incorrect phrasing is not an error on my part. Now, onto the main point here: why did the rebellious members of this party want to return to Jerusalem? What was stopping them from splitting from the group and going back? They weren’t being held captive. This is an odd, needless conflict that has no real purpose or explanation. It’s as if it’s written simply for the sake of having conflict. 

    The next several verses consist of Nephi admonishing his brothers for hardening their hearts against what God has supposedly told them to do. He talks about the land of promise and needing to obey God. This further irritates Laman and Lemuel, who take matters into their own hands. 

    16: “And it came to pass that when I, Nephi, had spoken these words unto my brethren, they were angry with me. And it came to pass that they did lay their hands on me, for behold, they were exceedingly wroth, and they did bind me with cords, for they sought to take away my life, that they might leave me in the wilderness to be devoured by wild beasts.” 

    This bears a strange resemblance to the incident in the Bible when Joseph’s brothers, in a fit of jealous rage, throw him into a pit and discuss what they’re going to do with him over lunch. While they didn’t kill him and sold him to a passing caravan instead, they did allow their father to believe he had been killed by a wild animal. See Genesis 37:18-36 for more details. Also, it may be a minor point, but where was everyone else when this was taking place? Were they simply watching Nephi being bound by his brothers?

    17: “And it came to pass that I prayed unto the Lord, saying: O Lord, according to my faith which is in thee, wilt thou deliver me from the hands of my brethren; yea, even give me strength that I may burst from these bands with which I am bound.”

    18: “And it came to pass that when I had said these words, behold, the bands were loosed from off my hands and feet, and I stood before my brethren, and I spake to them again.”

    I read these verses and thought of Samson’s last prayer to God to grant him strength one last time to avenge the loss of his eyes. I was also reminded of the instance when the Philistines bound him with cords and he broke them easily because of the strength God gave him (as long as he didn’t cut his hair, of course). Read Judges 16 for more information on Samson. It’s as if Joseph Smith took bits and pieces of Old Testament stories and scrambled them around just enough to make it not seem like he was taking his ideas from other sources. 

    This chapter continues with Ishmael’s wife and one of his daughters convincing Laman and Lemuel to cease their aggression against Nephi. Not another word is mentioned of Ishmael’s sons and daughters who joined Laman and Lemuel in their rebellion, so it’s impossible to say what they were doing when all of this was taking place or what their responses were to Nephi. That’s another strange, small plot hole. 

    Laman and Lemuel ask Nephi’s forgiveness, which he grants. Then they all hold hands and sing Kumbaya by a campfire. Just kidding. They all go down to where Lehi has settled and offer sacrifices and burnt offerings.  

  • 1 Nephi Chapter 6

    Nephi writes of the things of God–Nephi’s purpose is to persuade men to come unto the God of Abraham and be saved. About 600-592 B.C.

    1: “And now I, Nephi, do not give the genealogy of my fathers in this part of my record; neither at any time shall I give it after upon these plates which I am writing; for it is given in the record which has been kept by my father; wherefore, I do not write it in this work.

    2: For it sufficeth me to say that we are descendants of Joseph.” 

    It does not suffice. Listing the genealogy would give evidence to back this claim. The refusal to list it gives the impression that it’s a bogus claim that can’t be verified. 

    3: “And it mattereth not to me that I am particular to give a full account of all the things of my father, for they cannot be written upon these plates, for I desire the room that I may write of the things of God.”

    This is yet one more reason recording all of this on metal plates makes no sense. Engraving all of this would be labor-intensive, and there is a space limitation. This would be easily remedied by using leather as a writing material, which was common in the Old Testament.

    4: “For the fulness of mine intent is that I may persuade men to come unto the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, and be saved.”

    This deviates significantly from the Old Testament in that the purpose of prophets was to speak God’s word to the Israelites specifically. We see this all throughout the Bible when God’s prophets chastise Israel, advise various kings in matters of war, and prophesy the destruction of Israel as well as the coming of the Messiah. In the Old Testament, they were God’s chosen people. Proselytizing to make converts was not done. This is not to say that foreigners did not reside with the Hebrew people and assimilate to their culture and worship of God. Rahab and her family are an example of this. Not only was she permitted to live with them, she was also in the lineage of Christ. See Joshua 2:1-6 and 6:17-25 for more details on her. We also know foreigners lived among them because there were laws governing them and how they were to be treated (Exodus 22:21, Exodus 12:48, Numbers 9:14, Leviticus 12:48, Leviticus 19:33-34, Leviticus 24:22). So, we see others were certainly permitted to follow God along with the Israelites, but nowhere do we see where anyone actively sought out non-Hebrews to come follow God.  

  • Nephi Chapter 5

    Sariah complains against Lehi- both rejoice over the return of their sons– They offer sacrifices– the plates of brass contain the writings of Moses and the prophets– the plates identify Lehi as a descendent of Joseph. Lehi prophesies concerning his seed and the preservation of the plates. About 600-592 B.C. 

    5: But behold, I have obtained a land of promise, in the which things I do rejoice; yea, and I know that the Lord will deliver my sons out of the hands of Laban, and bring them down again unto us in the wilderness. 

    I would like to point out here the phrase “in the which things I do rejoice” makes no grammatical sense. It is not an error on my part. That is copied verbatim from the Book of Mormon mobile app. The main point of this verse I wish to address is the mention of “a land of promise.” Per the Old Testament, the “promised land” consisted of Canaan, which roughly corresponds to modern day Israel and Palestine. Genesis 12 is where God promises this land to Abraham. See Genesis 26:2-3; 28:12-13; 35:9-12; 48:3-4; and 50:24 for the repeating of these promises to Jacob and Joseph. See Genesis 15:18, Exodus 23:31, and Numbers 34:1-12 for a description of this land and its borders. Genesis 13:15 states,”All the land that you see I will give to you and to your offspring forever.” There is no other land of promise besides what is laid out in the Old Testament. When God states “forever,” He certainly means just that. He does not mean, “except for these descendants that aren’t documented in the Old Testament  that I’ll send someplace else.” 

    6: And after this manner of language did my father, Lehi, comfort my mother, Sariah, concerning us, while we journeyed in the wilderness up to the land of Jerusalem, to obtain the record of the Jews. 

    This is simply another example of odd and repetitive phrasing in the Book of Mormon. “And after this manner of language did..” appears three times in this chapter; once in verse 3, another in verse 6, and a third time in verse 8. This phrase serves no grammatical or practical purpose. “After the manner of language” follows something that someone said. We already know the manner in which someone spoke because they were quoted. Nothing more needs to be written about the manner in which they spoke. It’s also strange that Lehi and Sariah keep being named as the supposed author’s parents when it has already been repeatedly established that’s what their names are. Therefore, it makes much more sense for the above quoted verse to say, “This is how my father comforted my mother.” 

     11: And he beheld that they did contain the five books of Moses, which gave an account of the creation of the world, and also of Adam and Eve, who were our first parents;

    12: And also a record of the Jews from the beginning, even down to the commencement of the reign of King Zedekiah, king of Judah;

    13: And also the prophecies of the holy prophets, from the beginning, even down to the commencement of the reign of Zedekiah; and also many prophecies which have been spoken by the mouth of Jeremiah. 

    As mentioned before, all of this was already well-documented amongst the Hebrews and available to be reviewed. This is not some novel rarity that had to be wrenched out of the hands of someone else in order to preserve their history. The entire premise of 1 Nephi is hinging upon the existence of plates made from material that didn’t exist with records that were already known. 

    14: And it came to pass that my father, Lehi, also found upon the pilates of brass a genealogy of his fathers; wherefore he knew that he was a descendent of Joseph; yea, even that Joseph who was the son of Jacob, who was sold into Egypt, and who was preserved by the hand of the Lord, that he might preserve his father, Jacob, and all his household from perishing with the famine.

    15: And they were also led out of captivity and out of the land of Egypt, by that same God who had preserved them.

    16: And thus my father, Lehi, did discover the genealogy of his fathers. And Laban also was a descendent of Joseph, wherefore he and his fathers had kept the records. 

    There was no “discovery” of unknown genealogies. The Hebrews kept meticulous family records. This is easily evidenced by the extensive genealogies seen in the Old Testament. Everyone knew who their ancestors were because of these records and the divisions of the Israelite tribes. Had these people in the Book of Mormon existed, they would have been mentioned in these genealogies, especially if they were direct descendants of Joseph. The notion that Lehi didn’t know who his forefathers were is simply not at all plausible. 

    17: And now when my father saw all these things, he was filled with the Spirit, and began to prophesy concerning his seed–

    18: That these plates of brass should go forth unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people who were of his seed.

    19: Wherefore, he said that these plates of brass should never perish; neither should they be dimmed any more by time. And he prophesied many things concerning his seed.

    If these plates were to go forth unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, then why did the Book of Mormon not exist until 1830? Why would something so foundational to knowing God not be known for at least another 2,000 years? If these plates of brass “should never perish,” then where are they? The idea that they even existed is based upon the word of one man, Joseph Smith, who claimed to have translated the Book of Mormon from gold plates, which no one else actually saw. The initial three witnesses to the plates (Martin Harris, Oliver Cowdery, and David Whitmore) never physically saw them, but claimed to have seen them in a vision when they went into the woods to pray with Joseph Smith. What’s particularly troublesome is that, according to local press at that time, the three men told different versions of their experience. When Harris was questioned by a lawyer, he was asked outright, “Did you see the plates and the engravings upon them with your bodily eyes?” His answer was, “I did not see them as I do that pencil-case, yet I saw them with the eye of faith; I saw them just as distinctly as I see anything around me– though at the time they were covered with a cloth.” So in other words, no. He didn’t see them. He changed his story again later in life and claimed he saw an angel turning the gold leaves so he could see the engravings. Whitmer claimed Smith had led them to an open field and they saw the plates lying on the ground. Not being satisfied with three witnesses, Smith made the decision to have eight more witnesses sign a statement claiming they also saw the plates. Four of these witnesses were Whitmores with one being related to them by marriage; three more witnesses were Joseph’s own family members. The theory for how he obtained these eight signatures came from Thomas Ford, the governor of Illinois, who was very well-acquainted with several of Joseph’s key men after they left the church. Ford was told the witnesses were “set to continual prayer, and other spiritual exercises.” Then, “he assembled them in a room, and produced a box, which he said contained the precious treasure. The lid was opened; the witnesses peeped into it but making no discovery, for the box was empty, they said, ‘Brother Joseph, we do not see the plates.’” The narrative goes on to detail how he then berated them for not having enough faith, demanded they pray more and then were persuaded they saw the plates after two hours of frantic praying. These witnesses would detail the size, weight, and metallic texture of the plates. Conveniently enough, these plates were later taken back to heaven by an angel, which begs the question of why God would demand people believe something then purposely remove all evidence for that belief, especially when He hasn’t done so with the Bible. For more details on the eleven witnesses, see “No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith” by Fawn M. Brodie, chapter 5, “Witnesses for God.” 

  • Happy Sunday, readers! I hope everyone has had a blessed day thus far. Today, I will be covering the fourth chapter of 1 Nephi, which is quite a chapter. As I’ve pointed out in previous posts, a common theme thus far is strange similarities to Old Testament stories. In fact, the accusation of plagiarism is a fairly common one. In his book, “The Kingdom of the Cults” author Walter Martin argues the reason sections of the Book of Mormon so closely resemble passages from the KJV is because he copied parts of the 1769 KJV. Another criticism offered is the Book of Mormon contains various translation errors and passages lifted from the New Testament. The obvious issue with this is that the events in the New Testament were written centuries after when the events of Book of Mormon were purported to take place. He also points out the idea of ancient Hebrews being ancestors of American Indigenous people was common in contemporary sources, such as “View of the Hebrews” by Ethan Smith (1823). This theory is also put forth by author Fawn M. Brodie in her book “No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith.” I highly recommend these books for anyone wanting more information. Now, onto today’s reading.

    1 Nephi Chapter 4

    Nephi slays Laban at the Lord’s command and then secures the plates of brass by stratagem– Zoram chooses to join Lehi’s family in the wilderness. About 600-592 B.C. 

    2: Therefore, let us go up; let us be strong like unto Moses; for he truly spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and and they divided hither and thither, and our fathers came through, out of captivity, on dry ground, and the armies of Pharaoh did follow and were drowned in the waters of the Red Sea.

    3: Now behold ye know that this is true; and ye also know that an angel hath spoken unto you; wherefore can ye doubt? Let us go up; the Lord is able to deliver us, even as our fathers, and to destroy Laban, even as the Egyptians.

    See Joshua’s response to Israel regarding their doubt about being able to overthrow the Canaanites in Numbers 14: 6-9. This further confirms my theory that the stories put forth in the Book of Mormon are not original but borrowed from the Old Testament and repackaged as original and new. 

    7: Nevertheless I went forth, and as I came near the house of Laban I beheld a man, and he had fallen to the earth before me, for he was drunken with wine.

    8: And when I came to him I found that it was Laban.

    The next verses describe God convincing Nephi to kill Laban while he’s passed out drunk so he can take the plates. This is an odd series of events, because he could have simply taken them while Laban was so inebriated that he was rendered unconscious. Nephi hesitates, and God tells him more than once that he has delivered Laban into his hands. This reads like Joseph Smith wishes David would have killed Saul when he had more than one chance to do so. See 1 Samuel 24 and 26. It is important to note that there is not a single instance of God EVER ordering someone to kill another person in their sleep in the Bible. As much as I gleefully enjoy the story of Jael, God didn’t order her to drive a tent stake through Sisera’s head (See Judges 4). 

    13: Behold the Lord slayeth the wicked to bring forth his righteous purposes. It is better that one man should perish than that a nation should dwindle and perish in unbelief.

    14: And now, when I, Nephi, had heard these words, I remembered the words of the Lord which he spake unto me in the wilderness, saying that: Inasmuch as thy seed shall keep my commandments, they shall prosper in the land of promise.

    15: Yea, and I also thought that they could not keep the commandments of the Lord according to the law of Moses, save they should have the law.

    16: And I also knew that the law was engraven upon the plates of brass.

    At the risk of repeating myself, I will once again state that the laws and books Moses wrote were already available as well as the writings of Old Testament prophets. These supposed plates contained nothing new, so there would be no reason to act as if they were the last hope of preserving the laws, and there would certainly be no reason to decapitate a drunk man over them. 

    19: And after I had smitten off his head with his own sword, I took the garments of Laban and put them on mine own body; yea, even every whit; and I did gird on his armor about my loins.

    Why was Laban drinking in town in his armor with his sword? And would anyone put on the bloody clothes of someone they just killed? Decapitations are messy. There was no way that clothing and armor weren’t covered in blood. 

    20: And after I had done this, I went forth unto the treasury of Laban. And as I went forth towards the treasury of Laban, behold, I saw the servant of Laban who had the keys of the treasury. And I commanded him in the voice of Laban, that he should go with me into the treasury. 

    21: And he supposed me to be his master, Laban, for he beheld the garments and also the sword girded about my loins. 

    So he didn’t notice the blood all over Nephi and didn’t see his face the whole time they were talking? Was Nephi really that good at impersonating the voice of a man he had only spoken to once or twice? Was he really so convincing that the servant willingly went with him?

    24: And I also spake unto him that I should carry the engravings, which were upon the plates of brass, to my elder brethren, who were without the walls. 

    25: And I also bade him that he should follow me.

    26: And he, supposing that I spake of the brethren of the church, and that I was truly that Laban whom I had slain, wherefore he did follow me. 

    In addition to the other problems that have already been discussed, there is a glaring issue in verse 26: the word “church.” That word did not exist during the Old Testament. When recording the Israelites gathering to offer sacrifices and to worship God, they were called a “congregation” or “assembly.” The word and the concept of “church” is specific to New Testament Christians. It was never used in regards to gatherings of Jews. 

    The next few verses describe the servant going with Nephi to reunite with his brothers and realizing that he is not Laban. Then this happens:

    31: And now I, Nephi, being a man large in stature, and also having received much strength of the Lord, therefore I did seize upon the servant of Laban, and held him, that he should not flee.

    32: And it came to pass that I spake with him, that if he would hearken unto my words, as the Lord liveth, and as I live, even so that if he would hearken unto our words, that we would spare his life.

    33: And I spake unto him, that he need not fear; that he should be a free man like unto us if he would go down in the wilderness with us. 

    “Go with us or we’ll kill you” does not constitute an offer of freedom.  

    35: And it came to pass that Zoram did take courage at the words which I spake. Now Zoram was the name of the servant; and he promised he would go down into the wilderness unto our father. Yea, and he also made an oath unto us that he would tarry with us from that time forth.

    Is an oath made under threat of death really sincere? This entire chapter is incredibly far-fetched and makes no theological sense. The God of the Book of Mormon already differs from the Biblical God in that He orders an unnecessary execution on someone who was black-out drunk. I have a sneaking suspicion I will be seeing more of this in subsequent passages. I will continue this journey tomorrow.  

  • 1 Nephi Chapter 3

    Lehi’s sons return to Jerusalem to obtain the plates of brass– Laban refuses to give the plates up– Nephi exhorts and encourages his brethren– Laban steals their property and attempts to slay them– Laman and Lemuel smite Nephi and Sam and are reproved by an angel. About 600-592 B.C. 

    3: “For behold, Laban hath the record of the Jews and also a genealogy of my forefathers, and they are engraven upon plates of brass.”

    This has several problems. 1) The “record of the Jews” already existed in the form of the Pentateuch (the 5 books Moses wrote) and the writings of Old Testament prophets. There would be no reason to urgently seek this record out when it was already available. 2) Brass did not exist during the Old Testament. The Hebrew word “nechoshet” was translated as “brass” in early English translations of the Bible, such as the King James Version because the word “bronze” didn’t exist in the English language until the 18th century. We know brass to be an alloy of copper and zinc or copper, zinc, and tin. This alloy was not known in ancient times, but they did use the alloy copper and tin, which is bronze. (For more reading on this subject, see https://bible-history.com/backdrops/bronze 3) No civilization kept detailed records on metal plates of any kind. There are instances of small, engraved plaques, such as two small silver scrolls worn about the neck with a priestly blessing, dating to around 600 B.C. Writing materials during Biblical times consisted of stone, ink on plaster, clay, wood with wax inlays, ostraca (broken pottery), papyrus, leather, and parchment. The most common writing material was initially leather. Most of the Dead Sea Scrolls are recorded on leather. Papyrus became more common with the New Testament. However, parchment became more popular due to its durability. (For more information, see “How We Got the Bible” by Neil Lightfoot, Chapter 1: The Making of Ancient Books.) Due to the availability of much less cumbersome writing materials, it’s incredibly strange and unlikely that anyone would choose metal as their medium.

    19: “And behold, it is wisdom in God that we should obtain these records, that we may preserve unto our children the language of our fathers.”

    What language? Hebrew? Why would these plates be necessary to preserve their language when there were already written records available? 

    20: “And also that we may preserve unto them the words which have been spoken by the mouth of all the holy prophets, which have been delivered unto them by the Spirit and power of God, since the world began, even down unto this present time.”

    Again, these things had already been recorded. The Hebrew people kept very detailed records of genealogies, histories, and words of prophets. The reason these records can be trusted is due to the meticulous nature of copying these records. (See “How We Got the Bible” by Neil Lightfoot, chapter 12: The Text of the Old Testament.) This set of plates would not have contained anything new.

    At this point in the writing, Nephi and his brothers try to offer Laban “our gold, and our silver, and all our precious things” (v. 24). 

    25: And it came to pass that when Laban saw our property, and that it was exceedingly great, he did lust after it, insomuch that he thrust us out, and sent his servants to slay us, that he might obtain our property. 

    No one who wants to steal a group’s property is going to throw them out then send servants after them to take it. He would simply kill them right out and take what he wanted. As it turns out, they had to run and leave it behind, so he got their stuff anyway (v. 26).  

    Now comes the part where his older brothers get mad at him and his younger brother and start beating them with a rod:

    28: And it came to pass (that phrase yet again. It occurs in this writing at least 2,000 times) as they smote us with a rod, behold, an angel of the Lord came and stood before them, and he spake unto them, saying: Why do ye smite your younger brother with a rod? Know ye not that the Lord hath chosen him to be a ruler over you, and this because of your iniquities? Behold ye shall go up to Jerusalem again, and the Lord will deliver Laban into your hands. 

    Does this remind anyone else of Numbers 22:26-39 or is it just me? In that passage, Balaam’s donkey sees an angel standing in the narrow path he is on with a sword drawn, so he sits down and won’t go forward. Balaam proceeds to beat the donkey. God allows the donkey to speak, who asks Balaam why he’s beating him. Balaam airs his frustrations but is then able to see the angel standing in the road with a sword, who says, “Why have you beaten your donkey these three times? I have come here to oppose you because your path is a reckless one…” Maybe I’m just being nitpicky, but that’s what I immediately thought of when I read verse 28 above.

    31: And after the angel had departed, Laman and Lemuel again began to murmur, saying: How is it possible that the Lord will deliver Laban into our hands? Behold, he is a mighty man, and he can command fifty, yea, even he can slay fifty; then why not us?

    This is reminiscent of the Israelite spies in Numbers 13:25-33 giving a report of the land and insisting they could never overthrow its inhabitants due to their size and number. At this point, it appears to me that Joseph Smith has taken bits of the Old Testament and repackaged them as new information. I encourage everyone reading this to dig into the Bible verses I have quoted in these posts and see if you also see the similarities.

  • 1 Nephi Chapter 2

    Lehi takes his family into the wilderness by the Red Sea– They leave their property– Lehi offers a sacrifice to the Lord and teaches his sons to keep the commandments– Laman and Lemuel murmur against their father– Nephi is obedient and prays in faith; the Lord speaks to him, and he is chosen to rule over his brethren. About 600 B.C.

    5: “And he came down by the borders near the shore of the Red Sea; and he traveled in the wilderness in the borders which are nearer the Red Sea; and he did travel in the wilderness with his family, which consisted of my mother, Sariah, and my elder brothers, who were Laman, Lemuel, and Sam.”

    This is one of many verses that are oddly repetitive. You will not find verses such as these in the Bible.

    6: “And it came to pass that when he had traveled three days in the wilderness, he pitched his tent in a valley by the side of a river of water.

    7: And it came to pass that he built an altar of stones, and made an offering unto the Lord, and gave thanks unto the Lord our God.

    8: And it came to pass that he called the name of the river, Laman, and it emptied into the Red Sea; and the valley was in the borders near the mouth thereof.

    9: And when my father saw that the waters of the river emptied into the fountain of the Red Sea, he spake unto Laman, saying: O that thou mightest be like unto this river, continually running into the fountain of all righteousness!”

    In the interest of fairness, I think I should mention my search for answers as to where this river and valley might be. I did a basic Google search, and I only found LDS sources. All of them talked about a chance discovery in 1995 by a pair of LDS researchers who got lost in Saudi Arabia trying to find a site known to locals as the Waters of Moses. Per their report, they wandered along the shoreline of the Gulf of Aqaba when they stumbled upon a “magnificent narrow canyon” which “ended in a palm-lined cove.” This place was Wadi Tayyib al-Ism, which is 74 miles south of Aqaba. They calculated this to be roughly a 3 days’ journey from Jerusalem, which would line up with the narrative in this chapter. The LDS considers this significant because “continually running” rivers have not been known to exist in Saudi Arabia. It was noted that the river flowing out of this canyon was more like a small stream. However, geography does change over time, so LDS researchers point out this stream could have been a river at one point and float the possibility that Saudi Arabia could have been wetter in ancient times. For more information, see https://scripturecentral.org/knowhy/have-the-valley-of-lemuel-and-the-river-of-laman-been-found.

    11: “…they did murmur against their father, because he was a visionary man, to leave the land of their inheritance…to perish in the wilderness.”

    This is oddly reminiscent of the Israelites angrily accusing Moses of leading them to the wilderness to die. (See Exodus 14:11).

    22: “And inasmuch as they brethren shall rebel against thee, they shall be cut off from the presence of the Lord.”

    This is also strangely reminiscent of another occurrence in the Old Testament: when Joseph was chosen to rule over his brothers. (See Genesis 37: 5-11). I’m beginning to notice a pattern here.

  • 1 Nephi Chapter 1

    Nephi begins the record of his people– Lehi sees in a vision a pillar of fire and reads from a book of prophecy– He praises God, foretells the coming of the Messiah, and prophecies the destruction of Jerusalem– He is persecuted by the Jews. About 600 B.C. 

    2: “Yea, I make a record in the language of my father, which consists of the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians.”

    This does not make sense. They would have spoken and written in Hebrew. This book is purported to have been written in 600 B.C. The Israelites are traditionally believed to have left Egypt in 1446 B.C. There is no reason why a Hebrew would be recording anything in Egyptian after hundreds of years of being out of Egypt. Along this same vein, “Nephi” is not a Hebrew name. It’s commonly believed to be derived from the Egyptian language. Why would a Hebrew family give their son an Egyptian name?

    3: “And I know that the record which I make is true; and I make it with mine own hand; and I make it according to my knowledge.”

    This is an odd verse. Why write that something is true? Simply write what you were going to write. There are no verses like this in the Bible because it is assumed that whoever is reading it already knows it to be true.

  • I have chosen to first focus my efforts on the beliefs of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. They have four texts they consider sacred: the Bible, the Book of Mormon, The Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. I will be going through the Book of Mormon first with occasional side quests into the Doctrine and Covenants. I will be quoting passages of these texts followed by my own commentary. First, I have some observations regarding the introduction to the Book of Mormon and the statements of the witnesses.

    Introduction: “Concerning this record the Prophet Joseph Smith said, ‘I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding its precepts, than by any other book.”

    Here, we see Joseph Smith clearly elevates himself and the Book of Mormon above the authority of the Holy Bible.

    “We invite all men everywhere to read the Book of Mormon, to ponder in their hearts the message it contains, and then to ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ if this book is true. Those who pursue this course and ask in faith will gain a testimony of its truth and divinity by the power of the Holy Ghost. (See Moroni 10:3-5).

    First: God cannot be called “Eternal Father” if he was once a man, as Joseph Smith taught. Being a man means he had a beginning, which means he can’t be eternal. Second: This is not a reliable test of knowing if something is true or not. Anyone can declare that God told him that something is true. Feeling something in our hearts is no way to determine objective truth. On the contrary, Jeremiah 17:9 states, “The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick. Who can understand it? (NASB)” Furthermore, we are instructed in 1 John 4:1, “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. (NASB).

    The Testimony of the Three Witnesses: The end of the statement is “And the honor be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, which is one God.”

    This will contradict later teachings that God was once a man, achieved godhood, and bore spirit children, including Jesus. I will be curious to see when the belief in the Trinity changed to the current LDS understanding of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

    Check back in tomorrow. We’ll be going through 1 Nephi!